Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Carreon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 01:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Allan Carreon[edit]

Allan Carreon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Subject filed for certificates of candidacies Commission on Elections for Philippines President. Although there are reputable source from CNN, New Strait Time, but the articles mentioned Allan Carreon only in passing as one of nuisance candidates, calling himself "Intergalactic Earth Ambassador" where he claimed he was encouraged to run the position by aliens from the Facebook group.
  • Fail WP:NPOL or WP:GNG as without in dept content written about Mr. Carreon. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the coverage all basically approaches this as a slow news day coverage of the bizarre, not the stuff we make Wikipedia articles out of.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they didn't win — if he doesn't already have a strong claim of preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten him an article anyway, then he has to win the election, not just run in it, to become notable as a politician. While it's true that his candidacy got a blip of media coverage during the campaign, so did everybody else's candidacy — so that just makes him a WP:BLP1E, not a person who has passed the ten-year test for enduring significance yet. Bearcat (talk) 20:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.